| April 3, 2009
Dear friends and neighbors,
The House and Senate
majorities released their proposals for
the transportation, operating and capital budgets.
To view the budget proposals from the
House, Senate and governor, click
here.
Operating budget
Read the House proposal
here. Majority leaders propose reducing spending in
the operating budget by $3.8 billion.
To make up for the remainder of the $9 billion deficit,
they propose to use $5 billion in one-time
dollars from a combination of the federal
government, dedicated accounts in the capital budget and
transfers from other funds. This is irresponsible
budgeting. One-time dollars should be used for one-time
spending, not to fund ongoing programs and services.
Serious spending reductions should be made now
to help prevent a shortfall like this in the future.
Along with the one-time
shifts, Democrats and special interest groups will be
advocating for tax hikes. The cuts in the budgets were
done, I believe, to intentionally create the most noise
for tax hikes. Groups and state Democrats will
likely sell a tax package as the public's
opportunity to "buy back" some of the program cuts in
the budget.
This week, Senate majority
leaders introduced a serious
proposal to impose an income tax on
the most wealthy in our state. While this would only
affect those earning $500,000 or more each year, I
believe this proposal provides a way to expand
our tax structure in the future to include an
income tax on everyone.
I agree with Ronald
Reagan: "Governments don't reduce deficits by
raising taxes on the people; governments reduce deficits
by controlling spending and stimulating new wealth."
Capital budget
As ranking
Republican on the Capital Budget committee, I
have been very busy in the last few weeks (and will
continue to be through the end of session) being
involved in discussions on the capital budget
proposal.
There are many worthwhile
projects included in the proposal, including several for
our district:
-
$18.2 million for renovation and addition of
Hogue Hall at Central Washington University
-
$2.5 million for Columbia Basin ground water
management
-
$2 million for Yakima River basin water
storage feasibility study
I have several
concerns with decisions made in the capital
budget this year. Read the release I sent to the media
here. About $218 million is set aside for habitat
preservation and outdoor recreation. I am an avid
supporter of preserving public lands
and natural resources, but in a year when we're looking
at closing our state parks, we need to look at our
priorities. My priority this year for
this budget was to find projects that will
create jobs (especially in the private sector)
to spur our economy, as well as projects that are
crucial for infrastructure in our
communities.
More than $780
million is proposed to be taken from dedicated
accounts in the capital budget to fill part of the
massive shortfall in the operating budget. To make up
for it, the majority proposes to raise our debt
limit on bonding in the capital budget.
Shifting dollars is not sustainable or responsible
budgeting.
Boat lift fees
As you know, I introduced
HB 1750, to eliminate the fee for the use of
boat lifts on state-owned aquatic lands. The
measure died in the House Government Appropriations
Committee at the end of February. I met recently
with Public Lands Commissioner Peter Goldmark
about this fee and the concerns many of you brought to
me. His agency's concern is that the use of boat lifts
without a fee could shift the costs of management to the
general public.
He has committed to
conducting a transparent scientific review and
stakeholder process in which the Moses Lake
community will be invited to participate.
As resources allow, the Commissioner would like to work
with myself and Representative Hinkle and other
interested members of the Legislature to help develop a
stakeholder process involving all interested parties and
members of the public on this and
related overwater uses of the state’s shorelines. I want
you to know I will continue working on this
issue and sharing your concerns with the
Commissioner and his agency.
|