Go to Washington Legislature pageGo to House of RepresentativesGo to Senate

State Representative Bill Hinkle - 13th Legislative District

Go to Representative's Home PageBiographyNews and InformationMy BillsDistrict InformationContact Me!Go to Washington House Republicans' Home Page
  Printer-friendly page
 

News from Washington House Republicans.
 

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Nov. 13, 2008

 


Hinkle tries to protect horse boarding
operations from excessive back taxes

13th District representative asks DOR to act quickly to help farmers

Horse boarding operations around the state could face excessive back taxes if a state Department of Revenue (DOR) interpretation of a 1971 rule does not change. Rep. Bill Hinkle took the concerns of potentially-impacted farmers to Olympia today in the first of two public hearings on the issue.

The issue centers on the definition of commercial agricultural purposes in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 458-30-200. The rule requires that an owner’s land must be used for the feeding, breeding, managing, and selling of livestock to be eligible for a tax exemption. The DOR’s interpretation is that an owner must be engaged in all four activities to be eligible.

Many horse boarding operations that received the tax exemption over the years could be forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars in back taxes. Hinkle thinks this outcome would be unfair.

“Agricultural industries represent the largest employer in our state. In uncertain economic times, it’s vital that the Department of Revenue act quickly to protect farmers who could be facing huge and unnecessary tax bills,” said Hinkle, R-Cle Elum. “We have farmers who have been working hard and in good faith, and they should not be punished.”

The DOR is collecting comments and information on what farming activities are being carried out, whether or not they constitute commercial agricultural purposes, and their impact on the preservation of farmland. It is also evaluating the rule to see if more flexibility can be determined in eligibility.

Another solution could be found in the Open Space Taxation Act – a law designed to protect and preserve farm and agricultural lands. According to chapter 84.34 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), if land was previously classified as farm and agricultural land and no longer meets the criteria for classification, an owner can apply to have the land reclassified as farm and agricultural conservation land or possibly as open space land.

“This is another unfortunate example of the Growth Management Act failing to adequately preserve and protect farm and agricultural lands. And, quite frankly, why many people have come to distrust government,” said Hinkle. “One way or another, I’m asking the Department of Revenue to help these farmers.”

The next DOR stakeholder meeting is scheduled for the first week of December in Yakima. From there, it plans to begin the formal rule-making process.

“We have to protect those who raise horses in this state,” said Hinkle. “Because whether you raise horses or cattle, when you come to the back porch after a long day your boots still smell the same.”

Hinkle is encouraging people to share their views with the DOR and contact him if they have any questions. He can be reached at (509) 933-1238.

# # #

For more information, contact:  John Handy, Assistant Communications Director - (360) 786-5758
 

 
 

House Republican Communications - (360) 786-7031 * 408 John L. O'Brien Bldg. * Olympia, WA 98504-0600