Go to Washington Legislature pageGo to House of RepresentativesGo to Senate

State Representative Bill Hinkle - 13th Legislative District

Go to Representative's Home PageBiographyNews and InformationMy BillsDistrict InformationContact Me!Go to Washington House Republicans' Home Page
  Printer-friendly page
 

News from Washington House Republicans.
 

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 15, 2005

 


House-approved election reform 'disappointing,'
say 13th District lawmakers

Legislation approved Thursday evening to address problems that emerged during the November gubernatorial election falls far short of meaningful election reform that voters have demanded, 13th District Reps. Bill Hinkle and Janéa Holmquist warned.

“Citizens all over this state have told us loud and clear that they want the Legislature to fix our broken election system, and they want us to do it this year,” said Hinkle, R-Cle Elum. “They have also told us exactly what changes they want us to make. Unfortunately, the majority of citizens’ practical meaningful ideas were left out of the legislation we voted on this evening.”

“When I took the oath of office, I swore to uphold the constitution of our great state. Our state’s constitution guarantees ‘free and equal’ elections. However, after the fiasco of the recent gubernatorial election, many voters rightfully have lost faith our election system. Our citizens not only deserve free and fair elections, it’s their constitutional right. Unfortunately, the legislation moving forward makes a lot of empty promises that do very little toward restoring integrity to the elections process,” said Holmquist, R-Moses Lake, during her floor remarks.

During floor debate, Hinkle introduced two amendments to Senate Bill 5743 that he said would have transformed it from “title-only” legislation into meaningful election reform that voters have been calling for. He and Holmquist said it was “disappointing” that the Democrat majority did not accept the amendments, which would have required proof of citizenship when registering to vote and would also have required all voters to re-register by mid-2006.

“These amendments would have given the people the very reforms they have said will restore their confidence in our election system,” noted Hinkle.

“There is no higher priority this session than meaningful election reform. If voters believe the election system is flawed, they won’t trust any branch of government,” added Holmquist. “It’s not good enough to just say we passed election reform. True reforms need to be built into this legislation. Unfortunately, our proposals were passed up in favor of the status quo.”

A myriad of voting irregularities and problems came to light following the 2004 election, particularly in King County, where election officials are still finding uncounted ballots. Gov. Christine Gregoire later appointed an “Election Reform Task Force” to meet with citizens around the state and gather ideas for changes to the voting system.

The Senate bills considered late Thursday night and into Friday morning by House members originally included some of the reforms requested by citizens – including a requirement to show photo ID at the polls. However, Democrats in the House State Government Committee stripped out the voter ID requirement, as well as other key reforms.

Hinkle had earlier introduced House Bill 2226, a comprehensive election reform bill that would have, among other things, required voters to prove they were a U.S. citizen when registering to vote. Democrats did not give the bill a hearing and it died in committee.

Both Hinkle and Holmquist said amendments offered Thursday evening by Republicans in the House would have helped restore the integrity of the election reform bills, which otherwise do little to prevent a recurrence of the problems seen in November.

Those amendments included:

  • Requiring photo ID at the time of registration;

  • Requiring photo ID when voting at the polls;

  • Making provisional, absentee and poll-place ballots look different so they aren’t intermingled before being checked to make sure they are valid;

  • Requiring an additional piece of identification of absentee ballots (in addition to a signature), such as the date the voter registered;

  • Prohibiting election workers from “divining” voter intent and enhancing ballots; and

  • Ensuring every vote has a voter, requiring counties to reconcile the number of voters with the number of ballots cast, and triggering an automatic re-vote when discrepancies exceed the margin of victory.

The 13th District lawmakers expressed further disappointment that lawmakers may soon leave Olympia without enacting real election reform this year.

“In January, when lawmakers arrived in Olympia, it was clear that our election system was a mess and needed major changes. So legislators began jumping on the ‘election reform’ bandwagon, saying they wanted real changes,” Hinkle remarked. “Now here we are, three months later, at the point where we are taking votes on these issues. I am proud to say I stood on the side of real reform.”

“This is the biggest missed opportunity of the 2005 legislative session. Voters want true election reform, but now the Democratic majority is sending them ‘election reform lite,’” added Holmquist. “That’s not good enough. Voting is the sacred right of all who live in a free country. If we are to preserve that right, we must not let up until we have adopted true reforms that restore integrity to the process.”

# # #

For more information, contact:  John Handy, Assistant Communications Director - (360) 786-5758
 

 
 

House Republican Communications - (360) 786-7031 * 408 John L. O'Brien Bldg. * Olympia, WA 98504-0600