Go to Washington Legislature pageGo to House of RepresentativesGo to Senate

State Representative Bill Hinkle - 13th Legislative District

Go to Representative's Home PageBiographyNews and InformationMy BillsDistrict InformationContact Me!Go to Washington House Republicans' Home Page
  Printer-friendly page
 

News from Washington House Republicans.
 

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Nov. 29, 2004

 


Education funding and the state of the state

By Rep. Bill Hinkle

Providing kids with an education is state government’s paramount duty. That’s why the Legislature spends nearly 60 percent of the state’s budget on K-12 and college education funding. As a legislator and a parent, I want our children to have good teachers and strong schools. But I also understand we must balance those desires with the realities of our current state economy, as well as protect taxpayers by demanding full accountability for the dollars we do spend.

I addressed these issues at the recent Ellensburg Chamber of Commerce Legislative Day forum, and would like to expand upon them here. As we all agreed, every parent would like to walk into their child’s classroom and find a small group of kids and a well-paid teacher. That’s why Washington voters passed initiatives in recent years to raise teachers’ salaries and reduce class size. But here’s the tough thing about initiatives: They offer a mandate, but often neglect to identify a funding source.

Sometimes that isn’t a problem, because the state is running in the black and has the money on hand. But at the same time the teacher-salary and class-size initiatives passed, our state was looking down the barrel of a shrinking state economy and a $2 billion-plus budget hole. Funding the initiatives would have meant pulling money – huge amounts of money – from somewhere else.

Does anyone believe the people of Washington would have applauded the Legislature for decimating programs that provide health care for kids and seniors? Would they have wanted us to stop helping the nearly 1,200 patients in our mental health hospitals? Should we have cut into other critical services or even raised taxes, thereby hurting our chances at economic recovery? The Legislature didn’t think so.

Instead, Democrats and Republicans alike made the tough and responsible choice to live within our means and suspend implementation of these initiatives. Some have said we did it because we felt we were already spending enough money on education. On the contrary, we did it recognizing that these were important issues that would have to wait until our economy caught up to pay for them.

So when will we be able to fund higher teacher salaries and classroom reduction initiatives? Two things are needed: a better state economy and an accounting for the money we are already spending.

I wish we could say we’re over the budget hurdle, but I can’t. We will enter the 2005 legislative session Jan. 10 facing a state budget shortfall estimated at $1.5 billion. So for at least the foreseeable future we’ll be fighting an uphill battle.

Still, many teachers will see their pay go up this year. Despite what you may hear, the Legislature has indeed provided raises for our educators in recent years. In 2003, we provided almost $30 million in funding so entry-level teachers – those with one to seven years’ experience – will make no less than $30,000 a year. In addition, more than half of our teachers will get paid more this year as they “move up the pay scale” for additional experience and training. In fact, many would argue that teachers make a reasonable wage – for example, the average teacher in our area makes almost $48,000 a year before benefits.

In addition to needing a better budget outlook, we must let taxpayers know their education dollars are being spent wisely. Once education money leaves the state’s coffers, it’s out of our hands and the districts divvy it up. People want to know the money is being spent not only for teachers’ salaries, but that it’s also getting into the classroom in the form of books, curriculum materials and other supplies. An examination of our spending practices would no doubt help us stretch the dollars the state already invests in education.

Voters recognize this. On Nov. 3, they defeated Initiative 884, which would have raised the sales tax by a penny on the dollar, with the money intended for public education. Did that mean the public doesn’t care about education in Washington? No. I believe they do care, but are still worried about our state’s economy and realize that spending more money on something isn’t always the answer. Washingtonians are smart – they understand that when times are tough we must strike a delicate balance with our most pressing priorities.

In the meantime, I hope we can continue having reasonable, realistic discussions about what’s possible given Washington’s budget situation. I support the teachers in the 13th Legislative District, but I am also being asked to balance their needs with others, including state employees who want raises, the thousands of developmentally disabled patients on assistance waiting lists, and other critical state services.

If we can all come together in a collective effort to make every dollar count, we’ll weather this tough time and grow our economy so there’s a bigger piece of a bigger pie for everyone.

# # #

For more information, contact:  John Handy, Assistant Communications Director - (360) 786-5758
 

 
 

House Republican Communications - (360) 786-7031 * 408 John L. O'Brien Bldg. * Olympia, WA 98504-0600