Go to Washington Legislature pageGo to House of RepresentativesGo to Senate

State Representative Doug Ericksen - 42nd Legislative District

Go to Representative's Home PageBiographyNews and InformationMy BillsDistrict InformationContact Me!Go to Washington House Republicans' Home Page
  Printer-friendly page
 

News from Washington House Republicans.
 

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Oct. 3, 2005

 


Ericksen applauds measure providing tax relief for
Bellingham businesses

Rep. Doug Ericksen, R- Ferndale, is applauding the initial projections of a 2003 law intended to provide uniformity and fairness to businesses that pay a municipal business and occupation (B&O) tax.

House Bill 2030 overhauled the municipal B&O tax structure to provide more uniformity and allow businesses to allocate and apportion their income for city B&O tax purposes only to those cities in which they do business. This prevents double taxation on the same activity.

For example, if a furniture store in Bellingham sells a couch to a resident who lives in another city and delivers it there, only the city of the resident receiving the couch can receive the municipal B&O tax money. Prior to the passage of HB 2030, both cities could tax the sale of the couch – causing a double taxation scenario.

“I’m happy to tell businesses operating in Bellingham that they will no longer be overtaxed by the city on their municipal B&O tax in the future,” said Ericksen. “I’m glad this situation is being corrected and that fairness is prevailing – our businesses need it.”

As part of HB 2030, the Department of Revenue studied estimated impacts of the allocation and apportionment rules on business taxpayers and city governments. Overall, businesses should save over $23.3 million per year in municipal B&O taxes when these rules become mandatory in 2008.

While two-thirds of that amount, around $15.5 million, is from the city of Seattle, 38 other cities are affected. According to Department of Revenue projections, businesses that conduct transactions or activities in Bellingham, combined, should save an estimated $632,000 annually. Other business and cities’ numbers include: Aberdeen ($457,000); Bellevue ($2,023,000); Bremerton ($346,000); Everett ($773,000); Olympia ($365,000); Tacoma ($1,505,000); and Tumwater ($305,000).

There are three main ways local governments can tax businesses: regulatory licenses, revenue generating licenses, and the municipal B&O tax. Only cities are authorized to levy a municipal B&O tax and the rates are capped by state law and all classes must be taxed in the same manner.

Washington also levies a B&O tax on all businesses operating in the state. It is a tax on gross receipts – gross income, gross sales, or value of products – meaning no deduction is allowed for costs of doing business such as raw materials or employee wages.

Ericksen notes this is the only type of business tax in the country that uses gross receipts as its base, which can be hard on smaller businesses that have thin profit margins.

“Our B&O tax is onerous and disconcerting to any business already operating in or looking to relocate to our state,” said Ericksen. “It’s one of many structures we should take a long, hard look at as we contemplate ways to make our state more attractive to employers.” 

# # #

For more information, contact: John Handy, Assistant Director: (360) 786-5758
 

 
 

House Republican Communications - (360) 786-7031 * 408 John L. O'Brien Bldg. * Olympia, WA 98504-0600