Go to Washington Legislature pageGo to House of RepresentativesGo to Senate

State Representative Barbara Bailey - 10th Legislative District

Go to Representative's Home PageBiographyNews and InformationMy BillsDistrict InformationContact Me!Go to Washington House Republicans' Home Page
  Printer-friendly page
 

News from Washington House Republicans.
 

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Feb. 27, 2007

 


Committee hears Bailey's emergency clause bill, fails to vote

Bill would restrict use, prevent abuse of emergency clause

During its final meeting before an important legislative deadline for passage of bills, the House State Government and Tribal Affairs Committee took testimony today on legislation sponsored by Rep. Barbara Bailey that would restrict the use of emergency clauses.

"Our state constitution allows bills to become effective immediately if 'necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health or safety, support of state government and its existing public institutions.' In other words, if there's a real emergency," said Bailey, R-Oak Harbor. "But when an emergency clause is attached to a bill, it prevents the people of the state from exercising their constitutional right to refer the bill to themselves for their approval or rejection. Any attempt by this Legislature to deny the citizens the power of referenda should be severely restrained."

House Joint Resolution 4218 would amend the state constitution to require that 60 percent of the Legislature agree before an emergency clause could be added to a bill.

"Sixty percent of the members of the House and the Senate would have to agree that a real emergency exists before adding an emergency clause. Budget bills would be exempt," Bailey told the committee. "If this measure is approved, it would be placed on the November ballot for the approval of the people since this is a constitutional amendment."

In the last two years, lawmakers have attached emergency clauses to 447 bills. Bailey says that's far too many and she worries that the clause is being used not for emergencies, but to intentionally circumvent voters' ability to challenge a law through the referendum process.

"This is an important issue to the people and it is a matter of public trust. Over the last few years, the public has seen a proliferation of the emergency clause being unnecessarily added to many bills. In some cases, the governor has removed those clauses," noted Bailey. "By passing this resolution and letting the people vote on this issue, I believe it will help restore trust in government."

Although Rep. Gary Alexander, R-Olympia, and Evergreen Freedom Foundation Economic Policy Director Jason Mercier testified in favor of the measure, and no one testified in opposition, the committee took no action on the resolution.

Afterward, Bailey said she appreciated the public hearing, but is disappointed that the chairman of the committee did not allow a vote.

"This is very significant because we are only one day away from the cutoff for policy bills -- the day bills must pass from their respective committees or they are considered dead for the session. This issue is too important to let go," said Bailey.

"As I said in committee, it is a matter of public trust. How can we call funding of a new Sonics stadium or a new NASCAR race track an emergency? Yet the emergency clause has been attached to both of these bills, not for an emergency, but most likely for the sole purpose of circumventing the cherished right of people to put these issues on the ballot for a public vote," added Bailey. "When government powers are abused, all citizens suffer. Although I'm very disappointed this bill did not get a vote, I will continue working to restore integrity to the emergency clause."

# # #

For more information, contact: John Sattgast, Information Officer: (360) 786-7257
 

 
 

House Republican Communications - (360) 786-7031 * 408 John L. O'Brien Bldg. * Olympia, WA 98504-0600