| |
Statement from Rep. Doug
Ericksen on Substitute House Bill 1694 (2009 supplemental operating
budget bill)
“Today I voted ‘no’ on
House Bill 1694 – the first 2009 supplemental operating budget. Due
to the circumstances surrounding this bill, this was an easy ‘no’ vote.
I believe it is important for my constituents to understand why I voted
this way:
• Budget cuts, in isolation from policy solutions, are not in the best
long-term interest of our state;
• The Legislature has refused to make it clear that taxes will not be
raised. Once we make the decision not to raise taxes, we can focus on
real solutions; and
• The Legislature must set a spending limit and allow people to vote on
a constitutionally protected spending limit.
“The most recent tax
forecast for our state shows a projected 5 percent increase in total
taxes that will be sent to Olympia over the next two years, compared to
the current two-year budget. That equals more than $1.5 billion in
additional tax dollars for legislators to spend. This is on top of
record spending increases in the previous four years.
“There is
nothing compassionate about a mismanaged state budget. Now is the time
to fix the structural budget problems that face our state and to set
priorities. The budget voted on today fails to address structural budget
problems, fails to provide long-term policy corrections and fails to
offer the people of Washington the assurances that taxes will not be
raised.
“The argument made by some that our state faces a $6
billion budget deficit assumes state government will continue to grow at
record rates and that bigger government is the solution to every
problem. I do not agree with this argument and will be working to
provide real solutions for a better Washington that empower people and
limit state government growth.”
State operating budget
facts:
• The state will have 5 percent more money to spend in the 2009-11
budget cycle compared to the current budget cycle (2007-09).
• The 2007-09 operating budget has a spending growth rate more than
twice its revenue growth rate, including $1.7 billion in deficit
spending. •
State spending has increased by 33 percent, more than $8 billion, since
2005. • The
state had a $1.8 billion surplus in the 2005-07 budget cycle.
# # #
For more information, contact:
John
Handy, Assistant Director: (360) 786-5758
|
|